Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, action-oriented procedural skill with a clear sequenced workflow and a genuine validation section. Its main gaps are minor: missing error-recovery feedback loops, slight redundancy/background padding, and a few generic 'appropriate offerings' phrasings.
Suggestions
Add error-recovery guidance to the Validation section (e.g. 'If prerequisites are unmet, do not proceed; if the Feng/Shan order was violated, repeat the affected sacrifice') to turn checkpoints into true feedback loops and lift workflow_clarity toward 5.
Tighten conciseness by merging or removing the Overview (which restates the description) and trimming the Historical Context to a single inline note, so every line is instructional.
Replace generic phrasings like 'appropriate offerings' and 'appropriate offerings for Earth deities' with the specific offering types and vessel colors named elsewhere, to close the actionability gaps.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and action-oriented with brief, useful steps, but the Overview restates the frontmatter and the Historical Context section is background rather than instruction — minor padding that could be trimmed short of the every-token-earns-its-place bar of a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, domain-specific steps ('bury jade tablets with secret prayers', 'create a ritual platform facing east', 'use yellow offerings and vessels'), with only minor gaps where wording stays generic ('appropriate offerings', 'appropriate offerings for Earth deities'). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-phase sequence (Preparation → Feng → Shan → Announcement) is paired with a dedicated Validation section containing explicit checkpoints, but it stops short of a 5 by omitting error-recovery feedback loops describing what to do when a checkpoint fails. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under ~50 lines, single-purpose, and needs no external references; its well-organized section headers satisfy the simple-skill exception that lets progressive disclosure score 5 without separate files. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |