Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, concise instruction-only skill with a clear workflow and explicit validation checks. The main weakness is the absence of a worked example and explicit error-recovery loops.
Suggestions
Add one fully worked example (a sample official, their service, the assigned tier, title rank, land grant, and hereditary terms) to make the end-to-end process copy-paste concrete.
Add an explicit feedback loop in the Validation section: if an assignment fails a check, re-classify the contribution and re-evaluate before recording the oath.
State how magnitude mapping drives reward proportionality (e.g., dynasty-saving service → highest rank + largest grant) so the reward-determination step is unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place and the skill assumes Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, specific guidance — named tiers with definitions, magnitude criteria, and a service-type-to-tier decision map — but lacks a fully worked end-to-end example that would lift it to 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence (classify, evaluate magnitude, determine reward, record oath) with a Decision Points map and a three-item Validation section; recovery/feedback loops are implicit rather than explicit, keeping it below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short single-purpose skill (under 50 lines, no bundle files) organized into clear Overview/Steps/Decision Points/Expected Outcomes/Validation sections, satisfying the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |