Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, well-structured, and includes explicit validation steps, but several procedural steps are phrased abstractly rather than with concrete, actionable specifics. Tightening the vague steps would raise the actionability score.
Suggestions
Replace abstract steps with concrete guidance — e.g., specify how deadlines are set and announced, and what "maintain formation" concretely requires, rather than leaving them as directives.
The Overview restates the frontmatter description; consider trimming it to avoid redundancy, or repurpose it to add concrete detail the description lacks.
Make the Decision Points actionable by giving the explicit condition checks (e.g., criteria for "conditions favor victory") instead of open-ended assessment prompts.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and instruction-oriented; the symbol explanations (黄钺/白旄 = delegated military authority) are domain-specific rather than general concepts Claude already knows, and there is only mild Overview/description overlap. It is not below 3 because no padding of general knowledge is present. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Some concrete specifics exist ("Hold the yellow battle-axe (黄钺) in the left hand", example phrases "苍兕苍兕" / "後至者斩"), but several steps remain abstract — "Set clear deadlines", "Maintain formation and discipline", "assess whether conditions favor victory" — so it is not fully copy-paste-ready. It is above 1 because concrete actions and examples are present. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly numbered 4-step sequence is paired with a dedicated "## Validation" checklist (confirm symbols, verify consequences, check strategic assessment), matching the explicit-validation-and-checklist anchor. It is not below 3 because validation checkpoints are explicit rather than implicit. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, with no need for external references; the well-organized sections (Overview, Steps, Decision Points, Expected Outcomes, Validation) satisfy the simple-skill allowance for a top score. No bundle files exist, so structure is judged on section organization. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |