personnel-appointment-consultation

Use when filling government positions or matching candidates to ministerial roles. Guides collective consultation with the Four Peaks (四岳), merit evaluation, and role-to-skill mapping across nine ministerial functions.

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, actionable instruction-only skill with a clear sequenced workflow and explicit validation. The main improvements are removing the redundant intro/overview pairing and tightening the validation section into an inline feedback loop.

Suggestions

Remove or merge the redundant Overview sentence ("This procedure ensures qualified officials are appointed through collective wisdom...") into the opening line, since both state the same purpose.

Convert the trailing Validation checklist into an inline validate-and-recover step within the workflow (e.g., after Match Skills to Roles, verify the match and re-consult if a candidate's skills do not fit any function).

Consider extracting the nine role-to-skill mappings into a references/ file referenced from the body, reducing the SKILL.md footprint and improving progressive disclosure.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is largely lean and assumes Claude's competence, but the opening line and the Overview sentence restate the same idea (advisor consultation + merit evaluation + role matching), a minor redundancy that could be trimmed.	4 / 5
Actionability	Concrete, specific guidance throughout — an exact question to ask ("Who can excel in this position?"), a nine-row role-to-skill mapping, and explicit declination handling — with only minor gaps in coverage of edge cases.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	Seven steps are clearly sequenced and a dedicated Validation section provides checkpoints (skill-match, council consultation, declination opportunity); it stops short of 5 because validation is an end checklist rather than an inline validate-and-recover feedback loop.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Well-organized into Overview, Steps, Expected Outcomes, and Validation sections with no nested references; it is not a 5 only because the nine-entry role-mapping list is borderline content that could live in a separate reference file, and the body sits just over the ~50-line simple-skill threshold.	4 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that explicitly pairs a concrete trigger clause with a clear statement of capability, occupying a distinctive niche. The only weakness is that the listed actions lean slightly abstract rather than enumerating the literal operations.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists several concrete actions — "filling government positions", "matching candidates to ministerial roles", "collective consultation", "merit evaluation", "role-to-skill mapping" — but they stay somewhat abstract rather than enumerating the actual operations, leaving minor coverage gaps.	4 / 5
Completeness	Clearly answers both what ("Guides collective consultation ... merit evaluation, and role-to-skill mapping across nine ministerial functions") and when ("Use when filling government positions or matching candidates to ministerial roles") with concrete trigger phrases.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	The explicit "Use when filling government positions or matching candidates to ministerial roles" provides natural trigger phrases a user would say, with good though not exhaustive coverage of synonymous phrasings.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The government-appointment-consultation niche with Four Peaks and nine ministerial functions is highly distinctive with clear, specific triggers and minimal overlap with other skills.	5 / 5
	Total	18 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: baojie/shiji-kb
Path: kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_005/SKILL.md
Commit: 6b836e3

Reviewed: 5 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.