CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

personnel-appointment-consultation

Use when filling government positions or matching candidates to ministerial roles. Guides collective consultation with the Four Peaks (四岳), merit evaluation, and role-to-skill mapping across nine ministerial functions.

75

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is concise, actionable, and well-structured with a clear sequenced workflow and validation checks. It is a simple instruction-only skill executed cleanly with no redundancy or bloat.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and bullet-driven, assuming Claude's competence without padding; it avoids explaining background concepts and every line carries instructional value.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides concrete executable guidance: a specific question to ask ("Who can excel in this position?"), an explicit nine-row role-to-skill mapping, and defined evaluation criteria.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Seven steps are clearly sequenced, and a dedicated Validation section provides checkpoints (skill match, council consultation, declination opportunity, supporting staff) for the appointment decision.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

A single short, well-organized SKILL.md with clear sections and no bundle files; for a simple skill this size, well-organized sections suffice for top marks.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

85%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, complete, and clearly distinctive, with an explicit trigger clause. Trigger term quality is the weakest dimension because the phrasing is somewhat specialized rather than mirroring natural user language.

Suggestions

Add more natural-language trigger variations a user might actually say (e.g. "appointing ministers", "choosing officials", "evaluating candidates for government roles") to broaden trigger coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names multiple concrete actions — "collective consultation with the Four Peaks", "merit evaluation", and "role-to-skill mapping across nine ministerial functions" — rather than vague abstractions.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly states both what it does (guides consultation, merit evaluation, role mapping) and when to use it via the "Use when..." trigger clause.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Triggers like "filling government positions" and "matching candidates to ministerial roles" are relevant but specialized; common variations a user might naturally say are partially covered.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche is highly specific (ancient ministerial appointment consultation) with distinctive triggers, making conflict with other skills unlikely.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
baojie/shiji-kb
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.