Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-organized methodology with concrete if/then guidance, explicit risk lists, and a validation checklist with a trust-based feedback gate. It assumes Claude's competence and adds only the domain-specific framework Claude would not already know.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient throughout ~40 lines with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Instruction-only skill with concrete, specific guidance — explicit if/else branches ('If they seek fame...') and enumerated danger zones — so actionable guidance meets the rubric without needing code. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Validation section provides an explicit 3-step checklist with checkpoints and a feedback gate ('delay bold counsel regardless of urgency' if trust is still shallow). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references; content is well-organized into clear sections (Overview, Key Principles, Expected Outcome, Validation), satisfying the simple-skill allowance. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |