Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A compact, well-organized instruction skill with a clear sequenced workflow and verification checklist. Its main gap is actionability — steps are concrete in places but abstract on the how (character assessment, resignation wording).
Suggestions
Add concrete cues for assessing a superior's character (e.g., observable signals to look for) rather than the single 'long neck and bird beak' example.
Provide a concrete framing template or key phrases for the formal resignation step instead of the bare instruction to 'cite past service'.
Give specific guidance on what 'portable wealth' concretely means and how to arrange departure so it reads as mission completion rather than abandonment.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean bullet/step structure with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Steps name concrete actions ('Cite past service and mission completion', 'Take portable wealth and depart without returning') but stay high-level — there is no specific guidance on how to assess character or how to phrase the resignation, leaving key details missing. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 6-step process reinforced by a dedicated Verification section with explicit checklist items; this is not a destructive/batch operation, so the validation checklist is sufficient for a 3. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no external references needed; content is split into well-organized sections (Overview, Steps, Warning Signs, Outcomes, Verification), meeting the simple-skill allowance for a 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |