political-investment-strategy

Use when identifying and cultivating undervalued political figures for long-term gain. Follows Lu Buwei's 奇货可居 method: assess investability, provide resources, influence gatekeepers, and secure commitment from promising candidates.

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Critical

Do not install without reviewing

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A lean, well-structured strategy skill with clearly sequenced phases, concrete actionable bullets, and a useful verification checklist plus decision-point feedback loops. Its main weakness is that validation checkpoints live in a trailing section rather than being interleaved between phases.

Suggestions

Interleave validation checkpoints between phases (e.g., a brief 'Checkpoint' after Phase 1 confirming investability before moving to contact) rather than consolidating them in the trailing Verification section.

Add one short worked example or sample exchange (e.g., how to frame the pitch to a gatekeeper) to lift actionability from concrete guidance to copy-paste-ready instruction.

Tighten the Overview and Expected Outcomes sections to remove restated concepts and earn the top conciseness anchor.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is efficiently organized into short phases and bullets and mostly assumes Claude's competence, though the Overview and Expected Outcomes sections add a little color that could be trimmed.	4 / 5
Actionability	For an instruction-only skill the guidance is concrete and specific — e.g., "Approach through their trusted associates (sisters, friends)" and "Address their vulnerabilities (no heir, aging)" — with only minor gaps versus fully worked examples or sample dialogue.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	Five phases are clearly sequenced and reinforced by Decision Points (abandon/increase/accelerate) and a Verification checklist, but validation is concentrated at the end rather than embedded as inline checkpoints between phases.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, and needs no external references; it is well-organized into clearly labeled sections, which per the rubric's simple-skill exception warrants the top score.	5 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, well-structured description that gives an explicit Use-when trigger, names the underlying method, and enumerates concrete actions. It is distinctive and largely complete, with only minor specificity gaps relative to the most concrete anchor.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists several concrete actions of the method — "assess investability, provide resources, influence gatekeepers, and secure commitment" — but these are more abstract verbs than the concrete object-level actions in the top anchor, leaving minor coverage gaps.	4 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers both: "Use when identifying and cultivating undervalued political figures for long-term gain" (when) and the four-method action list plus named Lu Buwei 奇货可居 method (what), with concrete trigger phrases.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Natural domain phrases like "identifying and cultivating undervalued political figures for long-term gain" are present and would plausibly be said by a user needing this skill, though a few common synonyms (e.g., political investment, cultivating allies) are missing.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The niche framing — "undervalued political figures", "Lu Buwei's 奇货可居 method" — is highly distinctive with minimal overlap risk against other skills.	5 / 5
	Total	18 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: baojie/shiji-kb
Path: kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_180/SKILL.md
Commit: 6b836e3

Reviewed: 5 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.