Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A clean, well-organized procedure with a clear step sequence and an explicit validation section. The only weakness is mild supplementary padding in the Historical Context and Expected Outcomes sections.
Suggestions
Trim or fold the Historical Context and Expected Outcomes sections into the steps where relevant to improve token efficiency.
Add a brief feedback loop in the Validation section (e.g., what to fix and re-check if a verification fails) to strengthen the recovery path.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The core Steps are lean, but the "Historical Context" and "Expected Outcomes" sections add supplementary context beyond what is needed to execute the procedure and could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only policy skill the guidance is concrete and specific — named conventions (始皇帝, Second Emperor, Third Emperor) and explicit procedural steps rather than vague direction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Four steps are clearly sequenced and a dedicated "Validation" section provides explicit verification checks, so validation is present rather than implicit. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references, and well-organized into clear sections (Overview, Steps, Expected Outcomes, Historical Context, Validation). | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |