CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

proper-rulership-assessment

Use when evaluating governance quality, assessing leadership effectiveness, or auditing a ruler's conduct. Provides positive and negative indicators covering talent retention, crisis response, wealth distribution, and popular sentiment to diagnose state health.

70

Quality

86%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

72%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A concise, well-organized diagnostic framework with concrete indicators and a validation sequence, but it lacks an explicit synthesis/decision procedure tying the indicators to a final assessment verdict.

Suggestions

Add a short 'How to score' or decision procedure that defines how to combine positive and negative indicators (e.g., weighting, tally, or a verdict threshold) into a final ruling, improving actionability.

Sequence the full assessment as an explicit numbered workflow (gather indicators → pose assessment questions → cross-validate → render verdict) with checkpoints, rather than only sequencing the Validation step.

Tighten the Overview to one sentence or remove it, since it restates the description and adds little beyond the section headers.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean — organized as tight bullet lists of indicators and questions with no padding explaining concepts Claude already knows; only the two-sentence Overview is mildly redundant with the description.

3 / 3

Actionability

Concrete indicators and a named example ('retainers like 子贡, 颜回, 子路, 宰予') give specific guidance, but there is no decision procedure for how to weight or synthesize indicators into a final ruling, leaving the guidance incomplete.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The Validation section provides a sequenced 3-step cross-check with an error signal ('contradictions signal hidden governance failures'), but the overall assessment process (gather indicators → ask questions → reach verdict) is not explicitly sequenced with checkpoints.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

A short (~50 line) single-file skill with no bundle files and well-organized sections (Overview, Positive/Negative Indicators, Assessment Questions, Validation), which meets the bar for progressive disclosure without external references.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A well-constructed description with an explicit 'Use when' trigger, concrete capabilities, and a clear niche. It cleanly answers both what the skill does and when to invoke it.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions ('evaluating governance quality, assessing leadership effectiveness, or auditing a ruler's conduct') and specific content areas ('talent retention, crisis response, wealth distribution, and popular sentiment') rather than vague language.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Provides positive and negative indicators covering... to diagnose state health') and when ('Use when evaluating governance quality...') with an explicit trigger clause.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

The 'Use when' clause covers several natural phrasings a user would say ('evaluating governance quality', 'assessing leadership effectiveness', 'auditing a ruler's conduct'), giving good coverage of trigger terms.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The governance/rulership niche with its specific triggers ('ruler's conduct', 'governance quality') is distinct and unlikely to conflict with other skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
baojie/shiji-kb
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.