Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured instruction skill: clearly sequenced phases with concrete examples and a genuine verification/checkpoint section gating the risky final assault. The only ding is minor token redundancy in the intro and the ornamental quote.
Suggestions
Drop the opening restatement line since the description already covers it, or replace it with a one-line tactical summary that adds new information.
Trim or contextualize the 'Key Principle' quote so it reads as guidance rather than ornament, or fold its 'lull then strike' idea into Phase 3/4 where it is operationally relevant.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and avoids explaining known concepts, but the opening line restates the description and the 'Key Principle' quote is partly ornamental — mostly efficient but could be tightened, matching the score-2 anchor rather than the every-token-earns-its-place score 3. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete, example-backed instructions — 'Send old people and women to man the walls', 'fire cattle with swords on horns', the nose-cutting rumor — provide specific guidance; per the instruction-skill note, absence of code is not penalized when guidance is this concrete. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Phase 1–4 is clearly sequenced and the dedicated Verification section gates the final assault ('before launching', 'before execution', 'before committing'), matching the score-3 anchor of explicit validation steps with checkpoints. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the skill is under 50 lines with a single purpose; per the simple-skills note, well-organized sections (phases, Key Principle, Expected Outcomes, Verification) are sufficient for a score of 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |