Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, lean procedural skill with explicit validation for a destructive operation. The main weakness is the absence of feedback-loop detail for validation failures.
Suggestions
Add an explicit error-recovery loop in the Validation section: 'If exempted/prohibited categories overlap, re-categorize and re-verify before enforcement.'
Clarify the consequences if the 30-day surrender deadline is missed by an official beyond the generic punishment, to make the enforcement step fully actionable.
Specify how officials (以吏为师) are designated per region in step 5, so the new education system step is as concrete as the categorization steps.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient body with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place (Overview, Steps, Expected Outcomes, Validation). | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, specific guidance — named categories with original-language terms, a 30-day timeline, named officials (守、尉), and explicit punishments — but as an instruction-only skill lacks copy-paste executable artifacts, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly sequenced steps plus a dedicated Validation section with verify/confirm/check checkpoints; satisfies the destructive-operation validation requirement, with only minor gaps in error-recovery feedback loops. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, no external references needed, and well-organized into clearly labeled sections — meeting the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |