Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-sequenced, concrete process document with explicit validation checkpoints and clean section organization. The only notable weakness is mild redundancy and historical-specific padding that slightly undercuts conciseness.
Suggestions
Tighten or remove the 'Expected Outcomes' section, which largely restates content already implied by the steps above it.
Generalize historical specifics ('age 62', 'age 14', 'Wu Wang led personally') into parameter rules with optional examples to reduce event-specific padding.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient as a numbered process, but the 'Expected Outcomes' section restates what the steps already imply and event-specific color ('Wu Wang led personally at age 62', 'age 14') adds padding that could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, specific guidance throughout — exact reward tiers ('5000 jin gold, 10,000 household fief'), named allied states ('Minyue, Dongyue'), and explicit conscription age parameters — which is actionable for an instruction-only skill. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly numbered six-step sequence is paired with an explicit 'Verification' section whose checkpoints enforce ordering ('before issuing mobilization orders', 'before coordinated action begins'). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no need for external references, and its content is well-organized into Overview, Steps, Expected Outcomes, and Verification sections. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |