recruiting-honoring-talent

Use when recruiting capable individuals or retaining key advisors. Demonstrates respect through personal visits, public honors, and tests of sincerity to win loyalty from talented people regardless of status.

Quality

85%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Quality

Content

86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A compact, well-structured instruction-only skill with clear sequenced steps and a verification checklist. It is token-efficient and well organized; the only weakness is that several directives remain somewhat abstract rather than fully concrete.

Suggestions

Tighten abstract phrasing in the Steps (e.g. 'Endure tests of your sincerity without showing irritation' could specify a concrete behavior like 'continue the visit without changing tone or shortening the meeting when the candidate is deliberately difficult').

Add a brief feedback loop in Verification (e.g. 'If the individual shows only compliance, revisit steps 2 and 5 before considering recruitment complete') to push workflow clarity toward 5.

Consider one concrete short example or scenario under Steps to ground 'tests of sincerity' and 'public honors' in recognizable behavior.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean at ~30 lines with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section (Overview, Steps, Key Principles, Expected Outcomes, Verification) earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient' 5 anchor.	5 / 5
Actionability	Steps give concrete directives ('Approach them personally...', 'Host public gatherings...', 'Personally travel to meet them') that are actionable for an instruction-only skill, but some phrasing ('genuine respect', 'Endure tests of sincerity') stays abstract, fitting 4 above the incomplete 3.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	Eight steps are clearly numbered and an explicit Verification section provides checkpoints; this is not a destructive/batch operation so no cap applies, but there is no error-recovery feedback loop, holding it at 4 rather than 5.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Under 50 lines with no need for external references, yet well-organized into clearly labeled sections (Overview, Steps, Key Principles, Expected Outcomes, Verification), which per the simple-skills note earns a 5.	5 / 5
	Total	18 / 20 Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A well-crafted description that uses third person, includes an explicit 'Use when' trigger, and lists concrete respect-demonstrating actions. It is concise and answers both what and when clearly, with only minor gaps in trigger-term breadth and distinctiveness.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain (recruiting/retaining talent) and several concrete actions — 'personal visits, public honors, and tests of sincerity' — with only minor coverage gaps, fitting the 'lists several specific actions' anchor rather than the fully comprehensive 5.	4 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers both — 'Use when recruiting capable individuals or retaining key advisors' gives the when, and 'Demonstrates respect through personal visits, public honors, and tests of sincerity...' gives the what — with concrete trigger phrases, matching the 5 anchor.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	'recruiting capable individuals', 'retaining key advisors', 'talented people' are natural phrases a user might say, with good keyword coverage but a few common variations missing, matching the 4 anchor above the 3 ('some relevant keywords').	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The recruiting-and-honoring-talent niche is mostly distinct with specific triggers, though the soft domain has minor overlap risk with generic leadership/advisor skills, fitting 4 rather than the fully clear-niche 5.	4 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: baojie/shiji-kb
Path: kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_164/SKILL.md
Commit: 6b836e3

Reviewed: 7 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.