Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, well-organized instruction-only skill with a clear sequenced workflow and validation checkpoints. The main gaps are soft, non-executable phrasing in a few steps and the absence of an explicit validation failure-recovery loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean bullet-based content with no padding and no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place. Not below 5 because there is no discernible waste or over-explanation. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific procedural guidance (named positions, named conduct) for an instruction-only skill; absence of code is not penalized. Not a 5 because some steps are soft ('Display appropriate humility', 'offer guidance when appropriate') rather than fully unambiguous. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced four-phase process with an explicit Validation section providing checkpoints. Not a 5 because the validation lacks an error-recovery feedback loop (no 'if validation fails, do X') that the top anchor expects. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, no external references needed, with well-organized sections (Overview, Steps, Decision Points, Expected Outcomes, Validation); the simple-skill exception applies. Not below 5 because structure is clear and no nested references exist. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |