responding-homeland-crisis

Use when your homeland faces an existential threat despite personal grievances with its leadership. Guides the decision to set aside conflicts, mobilize resources, and reconcile with former adversaries for collective survival.

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill body is concise and well-structured with a clear sequenced workflow and a useful verification section, but its actionability is limited because the steps remain at the level of behavioral directives without concrete, executable detail on how to carry them out.

Suggestions

Add concrete sub-actions to each step, e.g. under 'Mobilize resources' specify which resource categories (personnel, supplies, logistics) and the concrete first action for each.

Strengthen the Verification section into a true feedback loop: define what to do when a check fails (e.g. if the threat is not genuinely existential, halt and reassess) rather than only listing what to confirm.

Make 'Decision Points' actionable by giving an explicit if/then rule for the pivotal moment so Claude can apply it deterministically rather than as a principle.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean and efficient with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place, matching the score-5 anchor.	5 / 5
Actionability	Steps give concrete behavioral directives ('Assess whether personal pride outweighs collective survival', 'Mobilize resources and return without delay') but lack specifics on how to mobilize or what resources, leaving guidance incomplete versus the score-4 anchor.	3 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clear numbered sequence is present and a dedicated Verification section adds explicit checkpoints (confirm the threat is genuinely existential, validate grievances are set aside), but the checkpoints are not paired with retry/feedback loops, capping it below 5.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	At under 50 lines with no bundle files, the body is well-organized into Overview, Steps, Decision Points, Expected Outcomes, and Verification sections, satisfying the simple-skill exception for a score of 5.	5 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it explicitly states both the capability and a natural 'Use when' trigger, names several concrete actions, and occupies a distinctive niche. The only mild weakness is trigger-term breadth, which lacks synonyms or extensions typical of the top anchor.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists several concrete actions ('set aside conflicts, mobilize resources, and reconcile with former adversaries') with only minor gaps in coverage, fitting the score-4 anchor rather than the comprehensive score-5.	4 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers both 'what' ('Guides the decision to set aside conflicts, mobilize resources, and reconcile with former adversaries') and 'when' ('Use when your homeland faces an existential threat...') with concrete trigger phrases.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes natural trigger phrasing ('Use when your homeland faces an existential threat') with good keyword coverage, though it lacks the synonym/extension breadth of a score-5 example.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Occupies a clear, narrow niche (existential homeland crisis with leadership grievances) with distinct triggers and minimal realistic conflict risk with other skills.	5 / 5
	Total	18 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: baojie/shiji-kb
Path: kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_168/SKILL.md
Commit: 6b836e3

Reviewed: 7 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.