responding-homeland-crisis

Use when your homeland faces an existential threat despite personal grievances with its leadership. Guides the decision to set aside conflicts, mobilize resources, and reconcile with former adversaries for collective survival.

Quality

80%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_168/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is concise, well-structured, and sequenced with verification checkpoints appropriate to a decision-making skill. Its weakest dimension is actionability, where steps read as philosophical directives rather than concrete operational guidance.

Suggestions

Tighten the actionability of key steps — e.g., replace 'Mobilize resources and return without delay' with concrete sub-actions (identify available resources, rally supporters, secure transit back) so the step is operationally unambiguous.

Add a brief decision criterion or threshold to step 3 ('Assess whether personal pride outweighs collective survival') so the branch between proceeding and not proceeding is concrete rather than subjective.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — no concepts are over-explained, and each section (Overview, Steps, Decision Points, Expected Outcomes, Verification) earns its place without padding.	3 / 3
Actionability	Steps like 'Mobilize resources and return without delay' and 'Assess whether personal pride outweighs collective survival' are decision directives rather than concrete, executable mechanisms; guidance is present but lacks the specifics that would make it fully actionable.	2 / 3
Workflow Clarity	A clearly sequenced seven-step process is paired with an explicit Verification section ('Confirm...', 'Validate...', 'Ensure...') that provides checkpoints before committing to action.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	This is a simple sub-50-line skill with no need for external references; its well-organized section structure satisfies progressive disclosure without bundle files.	3 / 3
	Total	11 / 12 Passed

Description

75%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description cleanly covers what the skill does and when to use it, with a distinct niche and explicit trigger. The main weakness is second-person voice, which both violates the third-person guideline and lowers specificity.

Suggestions

Rewrite in third person (e.g., 'Guides the decision to set aside personal conflicts... when a homeland or core community faces an existential threat') to comply with the voice guideline and recover specificity.

Broaden trigger terms toward phrasing a user would naturally say (e.g., 'homeland under threat', 'returning to defend one's community', 'reconciling with former enemies') for better natural-keyword coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names multiple concrete actions ('set aside conflicts, mobilize resources, and reconcile with former adversaries'), which would normally score 3, but the description uses second person ('your homeland', 'your leadership'), triggering a one-point specificity reduction per the rubric guidelines.	2 / 3
Completeness	It explicitly answers both 'what' (guides the decision to set aside conflicts, mobilize resources, reconcile) and 'when' via an explicit 'Use when your homeland faces an existential threat' trigger clause.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Phrases like 'existential threat', 'personal grievances with its leadership', and 'former adversaries' are relevant but niche and narrative; they lack the common user-side variations that would mark full natural-term coverage.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The homeland-existential-crisis-with-reconciliation niche is highly specific and clearly bounded, making accidental triggering for an unrelated skill unlikely.	3 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: baojie/shiji-kb
Path: kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_168/SKILL.md
Commit: 79c272f

Reviewed: 4 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.