CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

royal-remonstrance-method

Use when advising a ruler or selecting a remonstrance strategy. Offers four methods from metaphorical instruction (伊尹) to strategic withdrawal (箕子), with assessment criteria for ruler receptiveness and warning signs of a failed state.

75

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, concise instructional skill: it pairs a clear assessment-then-act workflow with concrete worked examples and a closing validation checklist. Progressive disclosure is satisfied through clean sectioning rather than external references, which fits this self-contained conceptual framework.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean bullet-point prose with primary-source quotes that earn their place; it assumes competence and does not pad with background explanation of what remonstrance or the historical figures are.

3 / 3

Actionability

A concrete decision rule ("Direct speech for receptive rulers / Indirect methods for resistant rulers") plus four worked examples each with a named figure and a translated quote gives specific, actionable guidance for an instruction-only skill.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The sequence (assess receptiveness → choose method → apply technique) is explicit, and a dedicated "Validation" section provides a checklist plus a feedback loop (warning signs of a failed state → withdrawal necessary), matching the anchor for clear sequence with explicit validation.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files are present and none are needed; the single cohesive framework is organized into clearly labeled sections (Assessment, Techniques, Principles, Warning Signs, Outcomes, Validation), which is appropriate self-contained organization.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

85%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it answers both what and when, lists concrete methods, and occupies a distinct niche. Its only weakness is trigger term coverage, which leans on the archaic term "remonstrance" and omits common phrasings a user might naturally say.

Suggestions

Broaden trigger terms to natural phrasings a user might actually say, e.g. add "counseling a leader", "correcting a ruler", "dissent", or "strategic advice" alongside "remonstrance".

Consider pairing the archaic term "remonstrance" with a plainer synonym so the trigger reads naturally to a wider audience.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Offers four methods from metaphorical instruction (伊尹) to strategic withdrawal (箕子), with assessment criteria for ruler receptiveness and warning signs of a failed state" names multiple concrete capabilities and methods, matching the anchor that lists several specific concrete actions.

3 / 3

Completeness

"Use when advising a ruler or selecting a remonstrance strategy" gives an explicit when clause, and "Offers four methods... with assessment criteria... and warning signs" gives an explicit what, satisfying the anchor for clearly answering both.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Triggers like "advising a ruler" and "remonstrance strategy" are relevant, but "remonstrance" is archaic jargon and common variations (counsel, correct, dissent) are missing, fitting the anchor for some relevant keywords lacking common variations.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The highly niche framing (伊尹/箕子, remonstrance strategy, warning signs of a failed state) carves a clear niche with distinct triggers unlikely to conflict with other skills.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
baojie/shiji-kb
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.