CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

royal-remonstrance-method

Use when advising a ruler or selecting a remonstrance strategy. Offers four methods from metaphorical instruction (伊尹) to strategic withdrawal (箕子), with assessment criteria for ruler receptiveness and warning signs of a failed state.

68

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-organized, lean instruction skill with concrete historical examples and an explicit validation checklist. It lands uniformly at 4 across dimensions: solid and actionable, with minor gaps in conciseness (a tangential section), method-selection precision, and the absence of a retry feedback loop.

Suggestions

Trim or relocate the "Sequence of Cultivation" (脩意/脩言/脩文/脩名/脩德) since it concerns self-cultivation rather than remonstrance, improving conciseness and focus.

Sharpen method selection into an explicit decision rule (e.g., a small table mapping ruler disposition → recommended method → fallback) so the actionability of choosing among the four methods matches the specificity of the methods themselves.

Turn the Validation section into a true feedback loop: after each checkpoint, state what to do on failure (e.g., if warning signs are present, fall back to Method 4 withdrawal and re-assess), adding the retry/branch guidance that would lift workflow clarity.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and bullet-based and assumes Claude's competence, but the "Sequence of Cultivation" (脩意→脩言→脩文→脩名→脩德) is tangential to remonstrance and could be trimmed, a minor instance of over-inclusion.

4 / 5

Actionability

Each of the four methods gives a concrete technique, a historical example, and a sourced quote with translation, and the assessment criteria and warning signs are specific; the gap is that method-selection guidance stays high-level ("direct speech for receptive rulers, indirect methods for resistant rulers") without a sharper decision rule.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

There is a clear assess→choose→apply sequence with an explicit Validation checklist and a warning-signs→withdraw branch, but no true validate→fix→retry feedback loop, so it sits at the anchor with most checkpoints present rather than the top anchor.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well-organized with clear headers in a single self-contained file with no nested references and no bundle files, but the body is just over the 50-line simple-skill threshold and includes the tangential cultivation section, a minor organization gap.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that explicitly covers both what the skill offers and when to use it, with concrete trigger phrases and a distinctive niche. The only gap is that just two of the four methods are named and the capabilities are stated somewhat abstractly.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several specific capabilities ("four methods", "assessment criteria for ruler receptiveness", "warning signs of a failed state") with named examples (伊尹, 箕子), but only two of the four methods are named and the capabilities are framed as offerings rather than crisp concrete actions, leaving minor gaps.

4 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers both "what" (four methods, assessment criteria, warning signs) and "when" ("Use when advising a ruler or selecting a remonstrance strategy") with concrete trigger phrases, matching the anchor rather than the anchor below whose "when" is generic.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"advising a ruler" and "selecting a remonstrance strategy" are natural trigger phrases a user would say, but a few natural synonyms (e.g., "counsel a ruler", "correct a ruler") are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It occupies a clear niche (classical remonstrance of rulers) with distinct triggers and named historical figures, so conflict with other skills is minimal.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
baojie/shiji-kb
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.