Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized, lean instruction-only skill with explicit validation and feedback loops. Its only notable gap is that actionability rests on a single example argument template rather than per-step scripted examples.
Suggestions
Add a short scripted example for one or two additional steps (e.g., a sample 'reframe' line and a sample 'sheath metaphor' line) to make every step copy-paste ready.
Optionally pair the Validation section's checkpoints with concrete corrective actions (what to do if the metaphor does not resonate) to strengthen the feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient throughout: terse one-line overview, compact numbered steps, and no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete, copy-paste-ready Key Argument template plus specific step guidance, but only one scripted example sentence covers the common cases rather than per-step worked examples. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Seven clearly sequenced steps plus an explicit Validation section with three checkpoints and feedback loops (anticipate rejection in step 4, track post-inclusion performance), satisfying the checklist/validation anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references; content is organized into clear, well-signaled sections (Overview, Steps, Key Argument, Expected Outcome, Validation) with no monolithic wall or nested references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |