Content
83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable and well-sequenced with concrete templates, examples, and a verification checklist. Its main weakness is conciseness due to repeated self-check and example blocks. Progressive disclosure is strong but references a non-existent evals/ directory.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the 自检功能 section against the inline 第6步 自检与润色 checklist — they repeat nearly identical items, costing ~30 lines of context.
Trim the repeated 太史公曰 examples (the 106-vs-52字删减示例 is shown in full twice); keep one concise instance and reference the rest.
Remove or create the referenced evals/ directory (cited in 参考文档 as '乔布斯列传、葛底斯堡演说等4个完整示例') to keep navigation promises intact.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is large (~530 lines) with considerable repetition: workflow steps are restated in the 自检功能 section, the 太史公曰 example appears multiple times, and some explanatory asides restate concepts. It is mostly efficient but could be tightened by de-duplicating the self-check and example blocks. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, copy-paste-ready patterns with explicit templates (X者，Y也), worked examples, replacement tables (是→为, 有→具), and a checklist of specific operations like deleting 的/地/得/了 — fully actionable guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The three-step conversion method (现代名词→文言→太史公) is clearly sequenced with explicit checkpoints, a numbered 解析/句式/修辞/自检 process, and a feedback-loop self-check checklist (自检与润色) for verification before output. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is good with three real one-level-deep references (modern-terms.md, classical-chinese.md, style-features.md) clearly signaled in the body and listed in 参考文档; however the referenced evals/ directory does not exist, a minor navigation gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |