Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A compact, well-structured strategy skill with a clear sequenced workflow and explicit validation checkpoints. The main improvement area is trimming the slight overview padding and adding a concrete remediation loop in the validation steps.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with concise step bullets and an example, but the Overview line ("victory often requires forming alliances. This method helps…") is mild padding that could be trimmed, keeping it just below the lean/efficient anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, actionable instructions ("Offer to cede territory or share spoils", "Ensure allies attack from different directions") and a concrete named example application; as an instruction-only skill the absence of code is not penalized, with only minor gaps in specificity. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 4-step sequence is paired with a Validation section containing three explicit verification checkpoints, but there is no true fix-and-retry feedback loop, so it does not reach the explicit-feedback-loop anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no external references and is organized into clearly labeled sections (Overview, Steps, Example Application, Expected Outcomes, Validation), satisfying the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |