strategic-location-selection

Use when evaluating locations for settlement, refuge, or strategic positioning. Covers geographic advantages, political landscape assessment, population disposition analysis, and long-term power projection, with decision rules to reject sites near rising powers and favor those with alienated populations.

Quality

76%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_114/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is concise and well-structured with a clear workflow and verification loop, fully benefiting from the simple-skills exception for progressive disclosure. Its main weakness is actionability: several steps are advisory abstractions rather than executable, specific guidance.

Suggestions

Tighten the abstract steps by adding concrete sub-actions or criteria, e.g. replace 'Assess timeline urgency' with a measurable trigger such as 'If the threat materializes within X, treat as urgent'.

Add a lightweight scoring or comparison rubric for the four evaluation dimensions so candidate locations can be ranked concretely rather than judged qualitatively.

Specify how to operationalize 'build influence with local population' with one or two concrete early actions instead of leaving it as a directive.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Lean and efficient body that assumes Claude's competence; it provides a framework without padding or explaining concepts Claude already knows, and every section earns its place.	5 / 5
Actionability	Some concrete guidance (named evaluation dimensions and explicit REJECT/FAVORABLE/HIGH PRIORITY decision rules), but several steps remain abstract ('Assess timeline urgency', 'Present the situation objectively', 'Gradually build influence') with missing operational detail on how to execute the assessments.	3 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clear five-step sequence is present with a dedicated Verification section and Decision Points acting as checkpoints; minor validation gaps keep it just below the top anchor rather than at 3.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Under 50 lines, single-purpose, and well-organized into Overview/Steps/Decision Points/Expected Outcomes/Verification sections; the simple-skills exception applies, so no external references are needed.	5 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Description

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is well-constructed, explicitly stating both purpose and trigger conditions with concrete domain terms. It distinguishes itself clearly and avoids vague fluff, sitting just below the top anchor due to minor coverage and specificity gaps.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists several concrete actions ('geographic advantages', 'political landscape assessment', 'population disposition analysis', 'long-term power projection', decision rules to 'reject sites near rising powers'), with only minor coverage gaps relative to the comprehensive anchor.	4 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers both what ('Covers geographic advantages...') and when ('Use when evaluating locations for settlement, refuge, or strategic positioning'), with the 'when' concrete but not maximally specific.	4 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Good natural-term coverage ('settlement', 'refuge', 'strategic positioning', 'rising powers', 'alienated populations') that users would plausibly say, though a few common synonyms/variations are missing.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Occupies a clear niche (strategic location selection) with distinct triggers, presenting only minor overlap risk with general planning or advisory skills.	4 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: baojie/shiji-kb
Path: kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_114/SKILL.md
Commit: 6b836e3

Reviewed: 7 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.