CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

strategic-military-assessment

Use when evaluating whether to wage war against nomadic or mobile enemies. Applies cost-benefit analysis using distance, terrain, force degradation, and the crossbow metaphor (彊弩之极) to recommend diplomacy or engagement.

75

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill body is well-organized, concise, and includes a verification checklist that gives the workflow clear validation checkpoints. Its main weakness is actionability: the criteria tell Claude what to consider but not how to measure or weigh each factor.

Suggestions

Add a brief worked example showing the five criteria applied to a sample scenario and the resulting recommendation, to make the guidance concrete and copy-paste ready.

For each criterion, specify how it is assessed (e.g., a rough threshold or scoring prompt for distance/logistics) so the directive verbs become executable steps.

Make the decision framework's combined condition explicit (e.g., how to weigh mobile enemy + low territory value + great distance into a diplomacy vs. engagement recommendation).

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean (~35 lines), well-sectioned, and does not explain concepts Claude already knows; the classical quotes are domain-specific source material rather than padding, so every token earns its place.

3 / 3

Actionability

Concrete factors and explicit if/then decision rules are present, but the per-criterion guidance is directive ("Evaluate the logistics", "Assess the adversary's nature") without measurement procedures or worked examples, leaving it incomplete rather than copy-paste ready.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clear numbered sequence of five assessment criteria precedes the decision framework, and a Verification checklist provides explicit validation steps (confirm all criteria evaluated, validate conclusion against evidence, check alternatives considered).

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Under 50 lines with no external references needed; content is organized into clearly labeled sections (Overview, Assessment Criteria, Decision Framework, Expected Outcomes, Verification), satisfying the simple-skill anchor.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise, specific, and complete, with an explicit 'Use when' trigger and a clearly demarcated niche. It avoids fluff and over-claims.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete inputs ("distance, terrain, force degradation, and the crossbow metaphor") and a concrete output ("recommend diplomacy or engagement"), matching the anchor for multiple specific concrete actions.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (cost-benefit analysis recommending diplomacy or engagement) and when ("Use when evaluating whether to wage war..."), satisfying the explicit-trigger anchor.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Natural trigger phrasing such as "evaluating whether to wage war against nomadic or mobile enemies" covers terms a user would plausibly say for this domain; not merely technical jargon.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche (campaign viability against nomadic/mobile enemies) is highly specific with distinct triggers, making conflict with other skills unlikely.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
baojie/shiji-kb
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.