CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

strategic-military-assessment

Use when evaluating whether to wage war against nomadic or mobile enemies. Applies cost-benefit analysis using distance, terrain, force degradation, and the crossbow metaphor (彊弩之极) to recommend diplomacy or engagement.

68

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a compact, well-structured decision framework with concrete criteria, an explicit decision rule, and a verification checklist. It is an instruction-only skill and is appropriately actionable without code. The main gap is the absence of an explicit error-recovery feedback loop in verification.

Suggestions

Add a feedback loop to the Verification section: e.g., 'If a criterion was skipped or evidence contradicts the recommendation, re-evaluate before finalizing.'

Tighten the few redundant lines (e.g., merge the '人马罢' bullet with the 'Enemy fights fresh' restatement) to push conciseness toward a 5.

Optionally make the decision rule more exhaustive (an explicit second/third branch) so the actionability covers more common cases.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean section structure with brief quotes per criterion and no padding of concepts Claude already knows; not a 5 because a few lines restate one another (e.g., '人马罢' then 'Enemy fights fresh against your depleted forces').

4 / 5

Actionability

Five named criteria plus a concrete conditional decision rule ('If enemy is mobile, territory has low value, and distance is great → favor diplomacy') give actionable guidance; not a 5 because the criteria describe what to weigh rather than fully specified, copy-ready procedures.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Clear sequence (criteria → decision framework → outcomes → verification) with an explicit verification checklist; not a 5 because there is no error-recovery feedback loop ('if verification fails, redo X').

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Under 50 lines with no external references needed; content is well-organized into clearly labeled sections (Overview, Assessment Criteria, Decision Framework, Expected Outcomes, Verification), matching the simple-skill exception for a 5.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: explicit trigger clause, clear statement of what the skill does, and concrete analytical dimensions. It is a niche, well-delineated skill with low conflict risk. Minor room to expand trigger-term synonyms and breadth of named actions.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and lists several concrete analytical dimensions ('distance, terrain, force degradation, and the crossbow metaphor') plus two actions ('cost-benefit analysis', 'recommend diplomacy or engagement'); not a 5 because there are effectively two actions rather than comprehensive multi-action coverage.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' ('Applies cost-benefit analysis ... to recommend diplomacy or engagement') and 'when' with a concrete 'Use when ...' trigger clause, matching the top anchor.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural domain terms like 'wage war against nomadic or mobile enemies', 'diplomacy', and 'engagement' are present and relevant; not a 5 because common synonyms/variations of the trigger phrasing are not exhaustively covered.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche (campaign viability against nomadic/mobile enemies) with distinct triggers and minimal realistic overlap with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
baojie/shiji-kb
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.