CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

strict-military-organization

Use when establishing military readiness through strict discipline and constant vigilance. Enforces formal formations, night watches, detailed records, and rigid standards to prevent surprise attacks and maintain combat preparedness.

70

Quality

86%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

72%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is concise and well-organized with a useful Verification section, but the guidance stays at a directional/abstract level without concrete procedures or a true validation feedback loop. Adding specifics such as watch-rotation cadence and an explicit verify→correct→re-check loop would lift actionability and workflow clarity.

Suggestions

Add concrete specifics to each principle — e.g. a sample watch-rotation cadence (e.g. 4 watches/night with shift length) and a formation structure — to move guidance from directional to actionable.

Turn the Verification section into an explicit validate→fix→re-check feedback loop, especially for the response-time transition check, to establish a real workflow checkpoint.

Sequence the Core Principles into an ordered implementation workflow (establish hierarchy → set watches → set up records → enforce discipline → verify) rather than parallel bullet principles.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is a lean bullet-list with no padding of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place, fitting the score-3 'lean and efficient' anchor rather than the somewhat-padded score 2.

3 / 3

Actionability

Guidance is directional ('Organize units with clear hierarchy and structure', 'Post regular night watches and patrols') rather than concrete with specifics such as watch-rotation schedules or formation structures, fitting score 2's 'some concrete guidance but incomplete'.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Principles are not sequenced into a workflow, and while a Verification section lists checks, there is no validate→fix→retry feedback loop, fitting score 2's 'steps listed but validation gaps' rather than the loop-based score 3.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

This is a sub-50-line simple skill with no external references and well-organized sections, which the rubric notes can score 3 for progressive disclosure.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is well-crafted: third-person voice, explicit 'Use when' trigger, concrete enumerated actions, and natural trigger terms with no fluff. It clearly satisfies the what-and-when bar and occupies a distinct niche.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'formal formations, night watches, detailed records, and rigid standards' — matching the score-3 anchor rather than the domain-plus-partial-actions of score 2.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Enforces formal formations, night watches, detailed records, and rigid standards') and when ('Use when establishing military readiness…'), matching the score-3 example rather than the what-only score 2.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Covers natural user phrasings such as 'military readiness', 'strict discipline', 'constant vigilance', 'surprise attacks', and 'combat preparedness' with good variation, fitting the score-3 anchor.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (strict military discipline/readiness) with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills, matching the score-3 anchor.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
baojie/shiji-kb
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.