Content
57%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-organized and concise enough for a simple instruction-only skill, but it carries some redundancy and would benefit from a concrete worked example to lift actionability and workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Consolidate the overlapping stability/legitimacy points across Core Principle, Decision Framework, and Expected Outcomes into a single statement to remove redundancy.
Add a short worked example (e.g., a ruler weighing two sons) showing how the rules and chain of consequences drive a concrete decision, to improve actionability.
Turn the Validation section into an explicit apply-then-verify sequence with a feedback step so the workflow has a clear operational checkpoint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely lean and well-sectioned, but the Core Principle, Decision Framework, and Expected Outcomes sections restate the same stability/legitimacy points, so it could be tightened further. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is specific ("Establish the eldest son as heir (not the younger)") and includes concrete validation checks, but as an analytical/advisory skill it lacks a worked example or procedure showing how to apply the rules to a real scenario. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear logical flow (Rules to Decision Framework to Expected Outcomes to Validation) is present with an explicit Validation checklist, but there is no operational sequence or error-recovery feedback loop, which leaves it short of the top anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no bundle files, and content is organized into clearly labeled sections, satisfying the simple-skill criterion for top progressive disclosure. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |