Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a compact, well-structured instruction skill with concrete measurements, a verbatim prayer, an interpretation table, and an explicit verification checklist. It stops short of full marks on actionability and workflow_clarity because a few procedural details (e.g., drill-mark technique) and an error-recovery loop are not specified.
Suggestions
Add a brief concrete detail on creating drill marks (tool, pattern, depth) so the procedure is fully executable.
Add a short feedback loop in Verification: if a check fails, state what to do (e.g., re-cleanse the shell, repeat on an allowed day) to raise workflow_clarity.
Trim the 'Expected Outcomes' list or fold it into Interpretation to remove minor redundancy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean with well-organized sections and only light orienting text in the Overview; the long prayer quote earns its tokens because it must be recited verbatim, leaving just minor trimming opportunities in 'Expected Outcomes'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and specific (1.2-foot shell, named prohibited days 子/亥/戌, face north, burn 正身 then 正足 three times, verbatim prayer, a classification table), with only small gaps such as how to create the drill marks. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Preparation and Procedure are clearly sequenced, and a dedicated Verification section provides explicit checkpoints (length, prohibited days/times, crack classification), though an explicit error-recovery feedback loop is not spelled out. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single well-organized SKILL.md under 50 lines with no external references needed; section headers cleanly separate preparation, procedure, prayer, interpretation, and verification. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |