Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and well-structured with a clear sequenced workflow and an explicit verification checklist. Its main gap is actionability: the physical execution steps (drilling and heat application) lack the tooling and technique detail needed to be fully executable.
Suggestions
Specify the tool and method for 'Create drill marks' (e.g., drill type, mark pattern/spacing) and for 'Apply heat' (e.g., burning tool, fuel, how heat is applied to induce cracks).
Add a brief note on how to read the crack positions in relation to the 首仰足开/肣 classification so interpretation is directly executable from the observed crack.
Consider a short 'If no clear crack forms' feedback step in the procedure so the heat-application loop has an explicit retry/escalation path.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean bulleted structure with no padding about what turtle shells or divination are; the full prayer text is necessary operative content rather than explanatory filler, so every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The exact prayer text, prohibited days (子亥戌), and interpretation key (首仰足开/肣) are concrete and copy-ready, but 'Create drill marks on the shell' and 'Apply heat to create cracks' omit the tooling and technique, leaving key execution details unspecified. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Preparation and Divination Procedure are clearly sequenced as numbered steps, and the final Verification section provides an explicit validation checklist (shell length, prohibited days/times, crack-pattern classification). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is under 50 lines, single-purpose, and needs no external references; it is organized into clear sections (Overview, Preparation, Procedure, Prayer, Interpretation, Outcomes, Verification), meeting the simple-skill anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |