Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A compact, well-organized analytical framework that gives concrete named examples and an explicit validation section without over-explaining background concepts. It is slightly more directive than executable, which is appropriate for an instruction-only skill but caps actionability just short of perfect.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean ~38-line body with no padding explaining who Sima Qian was or what virtue means; the small redundancy between 'Expected Outcomes' and the closing steps is the only thing keeping it from a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete procedural guidance with named examples (Bo Yi, Shu Qi, Yan Hui, Dao Zhi) and specific phrases to look for (积仁絜行, 余甚惑焉), but it remains analytical direction rather than copy-paste-ready steps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Four steps are clearly sequenced and a dedicated Validation section provides three explicit checkpoints, though there is no true validate-fix-retry feedback loop since the process is analytical rather than destructive or batch. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, no external references needed, and content is organized into clearly labeled sections (Overview, Steps, Expected Outcomes, Validation) — meeting the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |