Content
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured with a clear sequenced workflow and an explicit validation checklist, and progressive disclosure is appropriate for a short single-purpose skill. Its weakness is actionability and minor conciseness redundancy: the analytical method lacks guidance on how to weigh or conclude, and the Overview/Expected Outcomes sections partially restate other parts.
Suggestions
Tighten by removing or merging the "Expected Outcomes" section, since it restates the conclusions already in step 4 and the description.
Strengthen actionability by specifying how to weigh cases (e.g. minimum number of contrasting pairs, how to handle ambiguous or mixed outcomes) so the comparison step is executable rather than just "Analyze whether".
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient at ~37 lines with specific evidence anchors (积仁絜行, 余甚惑焉), but the Overview and "Expected Outcomes" sections restate the description and step-4 conclusions, so it could be tightened — matching level 2 rather than the fully lean level 3. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Steps give concrete examples (named figures, "starvation, early death vs. long life, wealth"), but the comparative method is incomplete — there is no guidance on sample size, how to weigh cases, or how to actually perform the assessment beyond "Analyze whether", fitting the level-2 anchor of concrete-but-incomplete. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Four steps are clearly sequenced and followed by a Validation section with three explicit checkpoints (verify both sample types, confirm specific evidence, check uncertainty acknowledgment), matching the level-3 anchor of a clear sequence with a verification checklist. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | At 37 lines with a single purpose and no external references needed, the well-organized sections (Overview, Steps, Expected Outcomes, Validation) satisfy the rubric's note that short single-purpose skills can score 3 without bundle files. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |