Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Well-structured, concise instruction-only content with an explicit validation checklist and decision branching for a destructive strategic operation. Actionability is the weakest dimension, as several steps describe ends without specifying means.
Suggestions
Add concrete 'how' guidance for the abstract steps — e.g., what form bribes take, how to identify 豪臣 by their coalition-coordination role, and what indicators confirm discord has been sown before military action.
Tighten the Overview and Historical Context sections to avoid restating the description and reduce token cost.
Consider folding the Expected Outcomes list into the Validation section so success criteria and verification checks live in one place.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and mostly efficient with no padding about concepts Claude already knows; the Overview and Historical Context sections lightly restate the description and could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Some steps carry concrete specifics ('300,000 gold', bribe '豪臣'), but 'sow discord' and 'execute military action' lack the mechanism for how to carry them out, leaving guidance incomplete. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced five-step process with a Decision Points branching section and an explicit Validation checklist (verify coalition threat assessed, confirm officials targeted, check military action only after disruption) — feedback loops are present and the destructive-operation cap does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A sub-50-line single-purpose skill with no external references needed, organized into clear well-labeled sections, satisfying the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |