Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized, concise reference of Xiongnu doctrine with a useful verification checklist, but it reads more as descriptive knowledge than actionable analysis procedure. Adding a short concrete procedure for applying the doctrine would lift actionability.
Suggestions
Add a brief 'How to apply' procedure (e.g., 1) identify engagement context, 2) select deception tactic, 3) check lunar phase, 4) apply spoils incentive) to make the analysis guidance executable rather than purely descriptive.
Replace or tighten the 'Expected Outcomes' section, which restates obvious consequences, to remove minor padding.
Make the Verification checks two-sided by stating what to do when a check fails (a fix-and-retry loop), which would strengthen workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Tight bullets pair each Chinese term with a gloss and avoid explaining concepts Claude already knows; only the 'Expected Outcomes' section is mild padding, fitting the efficient-with-minor-trim anchor rather than the fully-lean anchor at 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The body supplies specific doctrine terms and a Verification checklist, but it is primarily a descriptive reference rather than a concrete executable procedure for analyzing doctrine, matching the 'some concrete guidance but incomplete' anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Though not a multi-step workflow, the simple-skill exception applies and the Verification section supplies explicit checkpoints, placing it at clear-with-most-checkpoints rather than the implicit-checkpoint anchor at 3. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references and clean ## / ### section headers, satisfying the simple-skills note that well-organized sections alone warrant a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |