Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, concise interpretive skill with a clear sequenced procedure and verification checklist, and no external references to manage. It could improve by trimming the redundant Example/Expected Outcomes sections and adding an explicit validate-and-correct feedback loop around interpretation.
Suggestions
Remove or fold the "Example Interpretation" and "Expected Outcomes" sections into the procedure, since they restate steps already covered and add little new information (raises conciseness).
Add an explicit feedback loop in the Verification step — e.g., "If a step fails, revisit the hexagram transformation or line-text reading before re-checking" — to turn checkpoints into a real validate->fix->retry cycle (raises workflow_clarity).
Make Step 1's actions more concrete (specify how to record changing lines and which line-text conventions to read) so the procedure is executable rather than broadly prescriptive (raises actionability).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient — it does not explain what the I Ching is and uses terse bullet steps — but the "Example Interpretation" and "Expected Outcomes" sections restate content already covered in the procedure, leaving minor trimmable redundancy. It is above anchor 3 (which has clear unnecessary explanation) but not fully lean enough for anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only interpretive skill, the steps give concrete, specific guidance ("Note the original hexagram (本卦)", "Read the relevant line texts", "Identify the ruling clan of the future state") with named examples, yielding mostly actionable guidance with minor gaps rather than the fully executable/copy-paste level of anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly sequenced procedure steps plus a three-item Verification checklist provide a clear sequence with explicit checkpoints. It is below anchor 5 because there is no error-recovery feedback loop (validate -> fix -> retry), but above anchor 3 since the checkpoints are explicit rather than implicit. This interpretive skill is not a destructive/batch operation, so the destructive-cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, references no external bundle files, and is organized into clear sections (Overview, Procedure, Example, Expected Outcomes, Verification), satisfying the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |