Conciseness

The body is almost entirely skill-specific (routing table, security gates, token addresses, command-build rules) with virtually no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Matches the 4 anchor ("efficient; minor instances of over-explanation") rather than 5, because rule 7's closing "General principle: any action that diverges from the user's stated intent..." restates the rule above it, and the Campaign section duplicates guidance already implied by the routing-table row; not 3 because there is no significant padded or unnecessary explanation.

Actionability

Highly concrete throughout: exact commands ("wallet tx-history --type pending", "market-order swap", "defi lp-add", "approvals revoke"), the mandatory "Always append `--json`" flag, an exact wei conversion ("1 BNB is `--value 1000000000000000000`"), a complete API endpoint, exact confirmation keywords ("'yes', 'confirm', 'go ahead'"), and real contract addresses. As an instruction-only skill every user intent maps to a command plus a real reference file via the mandated "Always read the reference file first" procedure — copy-paste-ready guidance covering the common cases, matching the 5 anchor; not 4 because the inline commands, flags, and details leave no execution gaps for the covered intents.

Workflow Clarity

A clear numbered 7-step "Build the Command" procedure with explicit validation gates and feedback loops for irreversible operations: "Always read the reference file first", "Confirm with the user each time before any state-changing command", "run `wallet settings --json` and confirm `devMode.enabled=true`", "If preview returns an error, do not attempt `execute`", "Wait for the user to choose before doing anything", plus preflight checks at conversation start and an error-handling policy that relays CLI errors as-is. Matches the 5 anchor (explicit validation steps, error-recovery loops, checklists for complex processes); the destructive/batch validation cap is fully satisfied.

Progressive Disclosure

The intent→command→Reference routing table (e.g., "[send.md](references/send.md)", "[defi.md](references/defi.md)") signals all 17 bundle files, all of which exist in references/ and link only laterally to siblings (e.g., security.md → limit-order.md), keeping references one level deep. Matches the 4 anchor ("good structure; most content appropriately placed; minor organization gaps") rather than 5, because the ~75-line inline "Common Token Addresses" tables and the RWA stock-resolution instructions are reference-style data inlined in the always-loaded body; not 3 because navigation and file splitting are otherwise excellent with no buried or nested references.

Specificity

Quotes dozens of concrete actions — "check balance", "send/transfer tokens", "swap/buy/sell tokens", "limit/market order", "cancel order", "check/revoke/manage token approvals", "sign external transaction", "claim rewards/fees" — spanning auth, transfers, DEX trading, DeFi, predictions, x402 payments, and gas/tx management. This matches the 5 anchor ("multiple specific concrete actions; comprehensive coverage") rather than 4, because every feature area of the wallet domain is named with no notable coverage gaps.

Completeness

The 'when' is explicit and maximally detailed ("Use when the user mentions wallet connect/sign in/sign out, check balance..."), and the enumerated actions convey the 'what', but the description never explicitly states the underlying capability (e.g., driving the `baw` CLI to manage a Binance Web3 wallet). Not 5 because the 'what' is implicit in the trigger list rather than stated as a capability; not 3 because the trigger list itself names ~50 concrete operations, far beyond a weakly-implied 'what'.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user phrasing is comprehensive and synonym-rich: "send/transfer tokens", "gas price, gas fee, network fee, fee levels, gas tiers", "pending/stuck transactions", "send to ENS domain", "send to .eth or .bnb name", "HTTP 402 Payment Required", "redeem winnings". Matches the 5 anchor (comprehensive natural terms including synonyms); not 4, because it systematically enumerates synonyms and variations rather than omitting common ones.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Distinct niche triggers like "send to ENS domain", "x402 payment", "MEV protection", "prediction market", "EIP-712" clearly identify on-chain wallet operations. Not 5 because the catch-all "or any on-chain wallet operation" plus generic terms ("check balance", "deposit", "get a quote") create minor overlap risk with adjacent crypto/DeFi/token-lookup skills.