Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable skill body that sequences the changeset workflow clearly and points to canonical external docs rather than duplicating them. The only minor gap is the lack of an explicit feedback loop around the review checklist.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and token-efficient: it points to canonical repo docs ("`CONTRIBUTING.md` is canonical for...") instead of re-explaining concepts, and every section earns its place (e.g. the nursery-rule exception is Biome-specific knowledge Claude lacks). | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance — copy-paste `just new-changeset-empty` command, a concrete frontmatter block (`"@biomejs/biome": patch`), a change→level→branch table, and specific heading-level (`####`/`#####`) and prose rules. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced workflow (Decide → Choose Level → Create → Write → Review Checklist) with an explicit 7-item validation checklist, but no explicit "if a checklist item fails, fix and re-verify" feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A concise self-contained overview organized into clear sections, with a well-signaled one-level-deep References section (CONTRIBUTING.md, justfile, versioning URL) and no nested references or inlined content that belongs elsewhere. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |