Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and well-sequenced with real commands and validation loops, plus a properly signaled one-level reference. Its main weakness is redundancy: the diagnostics pillars and magic-comments guidance are each stated twice, slightly inflating the token budget.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicate 'High Quality Diagnostics' section (or the 'Three Diagnostic Pillars' block) so the three-pillar guidance appears once and points to the diagnostics-development skill.
Consolidate the repeated magic-comments/test-file guidance into a single block and fix the broken code fence at the '// should generate diagnostics' example (lines ~266-269).
De-duplicate the two 'Tips' sections (one near the semantic/query guidance, one at the end) into a single consolidated tips list.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and actionable, but the three-pillar diagnostics guidance is duplicated (the top 'Three Diagnostic Pillars' section repeats in 'High Quality Diagnostics') and the magic-comments/test-file block restates itself, including a broken code fence at the // should generate diagnostics example. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable Rust scaffolding, exact `just` and `cargo` commands, and copy-paste-ready code for rules, semantic queries, code actions, and options. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence (scaffold -> implement -> quick test -> snapshot -> codegen -> format/lint) with validation checkpoints and feedback loops such as `cargo insta accept/reject` and format-then-lint before commit. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with a real one-level-deep reference (references/OPTIONS.md) and clear signals to sibling skills (diagnostics-development, testing-codegen, changeset) without nested indirection. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |