Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with concrete commands, examples, and a real PR template, and is well-structured with one-level-deep references. It is slightly held back by minor verbosity and a checklist that lacks an explicit validation feedback loop.
Suggestions
Trim explanatory asides such as 'The summary serves the reviewer' and the rationale paragraphs to keep the body lean.
Reframe the Pre-PR Checklist as a validate→fix→retry workflow (e.g. run 'cargo test' and 'just l', fix any failures, re-run before opening) so validation checkpoints are explicit.
Move the verbose summary/test-plan writing guidance into a short bulleted form to reduce prose tokens.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and assumes Claude's competence, but some prose (e.g. 'The summary serves the reviewer', the rationale for AI disclosure) adds explanatory context that could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable commands ('cargo check', 'just f', 'just gen-rules'), real conventional-commit examples, and an exact copy-paste PR template, all ready to use. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered Pre-PR Checklist gives a clear sequence, but checkpoints are implicit and no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop is framed, so the sequence stops short of a full validation workflow. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single well-organized self-contained file with clear sections and a References block pointing one level deep to real locations (CONTRIBUTING.md, the PR template, external URLs); no bundle files are needed. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |