Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable workflow that front-loads the overview and delegates field-level detail to existing reference files, with explicit validation and browser-quirk recovery throughout. Only minor trimming of a few justifying sentences would push conciseness to a 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely lean and assumes competence, but a few rationale sentences ('Catching a misrouted request here saves a bounce later', 'The supervisor field names an accountable Museum staff person... so standing matters before the work starts') are minor over-explanation that could be trimmed without loss. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully actionable: concrete config paths, specific browser mechanics ('form_input fails on them... click them instead', 'Dates take YYYY-MM-DD'), explicit validation thresholds (≥7 days, ≤2 weeks, $10 cash deposit), and a copy-paste answer-sheet template covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 7-step sequence (Steps 0–6) with an explicit validation checklist in Step 4 and verification checkpoints in Step 5 ('screenshot to confirm the options are fully rendered', 'scroll back afterward to confirm'), plus an error-recovery loop for the dropdown animation failure. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Overview body points to two well-signaled, one-level-deep reference files (references/form-fields.md, references/config.example.yaml), both of which exist; bulk detail is appropriately split out rather than inlined. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |