Content
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an admirably lean, well-organized routing index with a clear navigation workflow, but it is fundamentally undermined because all ~30 referenced ./rules/*.md files are missing, making the progressive-disclosure structure and the concrete guidance it depends on non-functional.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced ./rules/*.md bundle (or whichever rule files exist) so the one-level-deep references actually resolve; a routing index with no targets fails its core purpose.
Remove the duplication between the four highlighted topic sections (Captions, FFmpeg, Audio visualization, Sound effects) and the bottom catalog, or fold the highlights into the catalog to avoid restating 'load the [./rules/X.md] file for more information'.
Add a brief one-line note on how to choose among rules when a task spans multiple concerns, so the routing step is unambiguous for overlapping topics.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean routing index that assumes Claude's competence, with one-line pointers and a compact catalog of rule files; it avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows and is not padded, fitting the score-3 lean/efficient anchor. It is not score 2 because there is no unnecessary explanation, only minor templated phrasing. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete routing guidance (specific named file paths plus one-line descriptions of each rule), but the instruction is incomplete because the referenced ./rules/*.md files do not exist, so the 'load this file' direction leads nowhere; this fits the score-2 anchor of concrete-but-incomplete guidance rather than score 1's purely abstract direction. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple single-purpose routing skill whose workflow (identify the topic, then load the matching rule file) is unambiguous and aided by both highlighted topic sections and a full catalog; per the simple-skills scoring note, a clear single-action workflow scores 3 without needing validation checkpoints. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Although the body is well-organized as an overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep references, every referenced ./rules/*.md file is absent, so scored against the actual (empty) bundle structure the progressive disclosure is non-functional; it fails the score-3 anchor of appropriately split content and lands at score 1 because there is nothing to progress to. | 1 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |