Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured overview that routes each of its four modes to concrete, existing reference files with clear navigation — exemplary progressive disclosure. The workflows and guidance are concrete but stop just short of fully self-contained: validation is lightweight without a feedback loop, and a few small redundancies could be trimmed.
Suggestions
Give the Extract workflow's "Validate" step a concrete check (e.g., the list of required fields or a pointer to the exact section of spec.md) and add a brief fix-and-retry loop so it functions as a real checkpoint.
Remove the duplicated "style_prompt_full is king" guidance and the repeated template links by keeping each fact in exactly one section (Format Quick Reference and Templates & Spec respectively).
Expand the required-fields YAML skeleton slightly or point to the minimal template inline for the Create workflow's Generate step, so the body's format guidance is complete without opening spec.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient — tables, short numbered steps, no explanations of concepts Claude already knows — but has minor trimmable redundancy: "style_prompt_full is king" appears both in Format Quick Reference and Best Practices, and the template links in the Create workflow are repeated verbatim in the Templates & Spec section. This fits the level-4 anchor (efficient, minor instances that could be trimmed) rather than the every-token-earns-its-place level 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is mostly executable for an instruction-only skill: numbered per-mode workflows, a batched question list, a YAML required-fields skeleton, and connector/extractor tables mapping each case to a specific file. Minor gaps keep it below level 5: the YAML snippet is partial (full field spec deferred to spec.md) and the Extract "Validate" step gives no concrete check to run. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | All four modes (Create, Extract, Apply, Gallery) have clearly sequenced numbered steps, and validation appears in the Extract workflow ("Validate — Ensure all required fields are present") plus a preview step in Create. It sits at level 4 rather than 5 because there is no fix-and-retry feedback loop and validation criteria are implicit; the destructive/batch cap does not apply since these are non-destructive file-generation operations. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a true overview — quick-reference mode table, concise workflows, format summary — with all detailed material pushed one level deep into clearly signaled reference files (connectors, extractors, gallery, templates, spec.md), each presented in a use-case table. Every referenced path resolves to a real file in the bundle, and nothing that belongs in a separate file is inlined, matching the level-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |