Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An unusually rigorous operational playbook: every workflow step has validation gates, self-check refusal criteria, and honest-reporting rules, and the concrete payload/tag/field detail makes it directly executable. Its weaknesses are verbosity — a 9.4k-word body that restates core rules in several sections — and three example-file references that point at files missing from the bundle.
Suggestions
State the hand-authoring prohibition once (in 'Mode and write path') and have later sections reference it — the rule currently appears in four places, and consolidating it plus splitting the ~400-word mode paragraph into bullets would cut substantial tokens without losing any rule.
Create the missing examples/ files (workflow-eval.md, red-team-eval.md, csv-eval-creation.md) or remove the three dangling references from the 'Reference files (load on demand)' section so every named path resolves.
Deduplicate the silence/hold guidance shared between the Tags table, the CA self-check, and the Personality section — one canonical rule with cross-references would tighten the body's most repeated topic.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | At ~9,360 words the body is dense and almost entirely platform-specific (no generic-concept padding), but several rules are restated across sections — the hand-authoring prohibition appears in the mode table, the mode/write-path paragraph, the direct-create self-check intro, and "Gaps after generation"; hold-vs-silence guidance repeats across the tags table and Personality; and the opening "Mode and write path" paragraph is a single ~400-word block mixing many rules. This sits between anchor 2 (several padded sections) and anchor 4 (only minor trimming needed): mostly earned content that still needs real tightening. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable for a tool-driven skill: exact JSON payload shapes (the CA create object, functions[] config), field-by-field request tables, a complete tag table with valid ranges ("ratio 0.1–2.0", "volume is 0–1.0", "time is bare milliseconds"), worked step/outcome examples, and hard gates ("Refuse to send a payload that fails any of these"). Concrete examples cover the common cases, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A numbered 7-step workflow with mandatory pre-reads ("Fetch the agent's full record before the first authoring write"), a single consolidated checkpoint, self-check gates before every write, post-generation reconciliation ("reconcile the count… regenerate the remainder"), and honest reporting ("say the evaluator is created but unvalidated"). Batch operations carry explicit feedback loops — stall detection with one bounded retry, smoke cohorts before large batches, and re-validate all outcome lines before PATCH — matching anchor 5's validation-plus-error-recovery profile. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Nine one-level-deep references exist on disk, are signaled inline at their point of use, and are re-indexed with one-line descriptions at the end; the inline/reference split is deliberate ("Everything needed… is here. Load references/conditional-actions.md for the pattern library"). However, three referenced files — examples/workflow-eval.md, examples/red-team-eval.md, examples/csv-eval-creation.md — do not exist in the bundle, leaving dangling pointers, which is an organization gap beyond anchor 5's 'easy navigation' bar but short of anchor 3's 'references not clearly signaled'. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |