Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable methodology skill with a clear six-step workflow, concrete templates, and good internal organization. The main gaps are a missing end-to-end worked example, no explicit error-recovery feedback loop, and some trimmable rationale prose.
Suggestions
Add one short worked example: a brief sample paragraph plus the resulting filled-in 核查节点明细表 row, so the full pipeline is concrete rather than only templated.
Introduce an explicit feedback loop for uncertain nodes (e.g., 'if a node cannot be verified after web_search, re-classify it as 无法溯源 and re-score ④/⑥') to strengthen validation checkpoints.
Condense the '为什么这么设计' rationale to the essential design decisions (two-step structure; short-board scoring) to tighten token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes Claude's intelligence (no padding about what arguments or sources are), but the '为什么这么设计' rationale and rhetorical flourishes like '这句话写得挺有文采' add length that could be trimmed without losing guidance value. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly concrete guidance — exact output-table columns, a full Markdown report skeleton, a filename format, named tools (web_search/web_fetch/present_files), and per-dimension '常见问题信号' examples — but it stops short of a complete end-to-end worked example applying the full pipeline to a sample article. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence pairs with a six-dimension checklist and verification gates (web_search, fermi estimation, short-board rule) plus a boundary-cases section; however, there is no strong explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop of the kind that would warrant a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a well-organized self-contained file (overview + six numbered steps + edge cases) with easy header navigation and no content that clearly belongs in separate files, though at ~130 lines it is somewhat long for a single file and the design rationale could arguably be condensed. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |