Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A strong, well-structured instruction skill: the 7-step workflow is clearly sequenced and backed by a validation checklist with remediation steps, and the guidance (tools, naming, banned words, output format) is largely executable. The main weaknesses are mild token duplication between Step 4 and the output-example section, and the absence of a concrete chart example for the most fragile step.
Suggestions
Merge the "输出示例结构" section into Step 4's article skeleton (or replace the skeleton with it) — they describe the same structure twice and cost tokens without adding guidance.
Add one minimal copy-paste example for the chart requirements (e.g., a 3-line mermaid flowchart snippet and a small text-annotated SVG stub) so the 'at least 2 figures' rule is executable rather than aspirational.
Move the banned-word list and the quality self-check checklist into a references/ file (e.g., STYLE.md and CHECKLIST.md) linked from the body, shortening SKILL.md and giving the bundle proper progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient — it never explains background concepts Claude already knows, and instructions like the viewpoint template and banned-word list are dense with unique value. Minor trimmable padding: the "输出示例结构" section largely duplicates the Step-4 article skeleton, and a few flourishes ("制造认知张力") could be tightened. Not 5 because of that duplication; not 3 because there is no genuinely unnecessary explanation. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete throughout: named tools (web_fetch, web_search, present_files), exact commands (`mkdir -p markdown`), a file-naming pattern with date placeholder, YAML frontmatter spec, a template for viewpoint analysis, and a hard banned-word list. Not 5 because the chart requirements ("SVG 简图（用文字标注数据）" and the Mermaid specs) give no copy-paste-ready example, leaving the most fragile step underspecified; not 3 because most guidance is directly executable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 7-step process (fetch → extract assumptions → find flaws / reconstruct → build skeleton → search data → write → output file) capped by an explicit "质量自检清单" with per-item remediation (删除/替换/补充/优化), which is a real validate-and-fix feedback loop. This matches anchor 5's 'explicit validation steps, feedback loops, checklists'; no destructive/batch-operation cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, so everything must live in SKILL.md; the single file is well-organized with clear section headers and navigable structure. It sits between anchor 4 (good structure, content appropriately placed) and anchor 5 (which presumes well-signaled one-level-deep references / genuinely split content); the ~155-line body and the inline banned-word list and output-example section could arguably live in reference files, so 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |