Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable template skill: the mandated article structure, quantified content thresholds, and diagram specifications give Claude everything needed to execute in one pass. Main gaps are the absence of a worked example (especially a sample SVG/Mermaid block) and the lack of any fact-checking or fix-and-retry step around the generation workflow.
Suggestions
Add a short worked example — one completed section (e.g., 直觉理解) with an actual SVG and Mermaid snippet — so the diagram conventions are demonstrated, not just specified; this would raise actionability to the top anchor.
Insert a verification step into 执行步骤 (e.g., 'before writing, verify the derivation and dates against reliable sources; if uncertain, mark claims as tentative') and pair the quality checklist with an explicit fix-and-retry loop.
Fold the soft 写作风格要求 guidance into the template's inline section hints to trim redundancy and tighten conciseness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient: every section carries instructions Claude does not already know (the mandated article template, file naming, SVG viewBox specs, Mermaid node limits, count thresholds), with no padding that explains known concepts. It falls short of the 'every token earns its place' level-5 anchor because sections like 写作风格要求 ("通俗优先", "有温度") are soft guidance that could be tightened into the template itself. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is highly concrete for an instruction-only skill: an exact article skeleton in a copyable code block, filename convention (`{主题拼音或英文}.md`), save path, diagram-spec table, and quantified content floors (正例 ≥ 3, 反例 ≥ 2, 问题 ≥ 3, 图表 ≥ 2 种). It misses level 5 because no sample output is shown — e.g., one filled-in section with an actual SVG or Mermaid snippet — so the diagram conventions are specified but never demonstrated. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 执行步骤 section gives a clear 7-step sequence from input classification through `mkdir -p markdown` to saving and presenting the file, and the final 质量检查清单 acts as an explicit validation checkpoint. It does not reach level 5 because the checklist is stated as post-hoc confirmation with no fix-and-retry loop, and there is no step to verify factual accuracy of the derivation before writing. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The bundle is a single SKILL.md (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories exist, and the body references no external files), yet nothing here clearly belongs in a separate file — the template, diagram rules, and checklist all need to be in view at generation time. Sections are well-organized with clear headers and a navigable structure, matching the well-organized single-file ideal. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |