Content
70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable research-and-writing workflow with excellent validation checkpoints and fallback handling. The main weaknesses are mild verbosity in stylistic guidance and a missed progressive-disclosure opportunity: an existing reference file is duplicated inline rather than linked.
Suggestions
Replace the inlined high-quality-source priority list in Step 1.2 with a link to the existing references/high-quality-sources.md (e.g. 'See [high-quality-sources.md](references/high-quality-sources.md)') to avoid duplication and fix the missing reference signal.
Trim repeated stylistic coaching ('有温度', '通俗易懂', '适合分享') and the per-section word-count annotations in the template to reduce padding Claude doesn't need.
Note that web_fetch/web_search are shown as pseudocode; if real tool signatures exist, make the calls copy-paste ready, otherwise briefly justify the shorthand.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly targeted instructional content, but stylistic coaching Claude already grasps ('有温度', '通俗易懂', '适合分享') is repeated and per-section word-count prescriptions pad the template; could be tightened without losing clarity. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete search-query templates, file-path/naming examples, a YAML frontmatter template, and a full output structure — mostly executable, with minor gaps (web_fetch/web_search shown as pseudocode rather than real signatures, SVG guidance abstract). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 0–5 are clearly sequenced with explicit '✅ 检查点' confirm-gates, fallback branches for cold books / no-results / Douban failure, a confirm-before-save guard, and a final quality checklist — strong feedback loops throughout. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good section structure exists, but a reference file (references/high-quality-sources.md) is present yet never linked from the body, and its source-priority content is duplicated inline — content that should be offloaded is not clearly signaled. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |