Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured multi-step skill: every step is executable, the rewrite loop re-validates with the same objective script and caps iterations with honest failure reporting, and detail is properly pushed to the two real bundle files. The only trimmable material is the design-rationale prose in the opening section and the threshold-semantics paragraph in step 4.
Suggestions
Condense the opening "为什么这么设计" section to 2-3 lines — the two-layer rationale is largely re-derivable from steps 2-4.
Move the step-4 discussion of what the 80-point threshold does and does not guarantee into a short note; keep the operational rule (default 80, user override) up front.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient: tight step structure, concrete tables, and explicit restraint ("具体方法见脚本内注释，不用解释给用户听"). Not 5 because the opening design-rationale section and the step-4 threshold-semantics paragraph are justifications that could be trimmed without losing executability. Not 3: no explanations of concepts Claude already knows; padding is minor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: copy-paste script invocations for both file and inline-text input, a concrete per-dimension table of what to look for, a verbatim report template, and specific rewrite tactics with before/after examples ("综上所述，这是一个值得关注的趋势" → 直接给结论). Matches the copy-paste-ready anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–6 are clearly sequenced with an explicit validation feedback loop: "重新跑一遍第二步的脚本 + 第三步的人工评分…最多改 3 轮", plus honest-failure handling ("不要硬编数据把分数做上去") and edge cases covering batch multi-file input. Matches the explicit-validation-with-error-recovery anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body stays an overview and offloads detail one level deep to real, clearly signaled files: "详细的打分锚点…见 references/rubric.md" (exists, 66 lines) and the scoring script (exists, 229 lines). The inline report template is required output spec, appropriately inline. Clear navigation with no nested references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |