Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, highly actionable skill body: explicit workflow, a required article template, executable SQL/diagram examples, and a pre-save self-check checklist. Its main weaknesses are token efficiency (duplicated illustrative sections could be trimmed) and the complete absence of progressive disclosure — the entire topic catalog, sample excerpt, and per-category guidance are inlined rather than split into reference files.
Suggestions
Move the 主题速查表 (§八) and 示例输出片段 (§十) into a references/ file (e.g. references/topics.md and references/sample-heap.md) and link them with one-line pointers, converting the body into a lean overview.
Trim §三's per-category sub-bullets to one representative category inline and point the rest to the reference file; the current detail level duplicates what the topic catalog already signals.
Add an explicit feedback loop to the 自检 step: 'if any checklist item fails, fix and re-run the checklist before saving', mirroring the validate→fix→retry pattern the rubric rewards for workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly prescriptive rather than explanatory of known concepts, but it includes tightening opportunities: the 40-line 示例输出片段 (§十) partially duplicates §三 and §四 guidance, and the 主题速查表 (§八) plus detailed per-topic sub-bullets in §三 run long for a context file. It is above the 2 anchor ('several unnecessary explanations or padded sections') because nearly all content is directive rather than padded explanation, but below 4 because whole sections could be trimmed or split out without losing clarity. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance throughout: runnable SQL with pageinspect ('SELECT * FROM heap_page_items(get_raw_page(''tbl_demo'', 0))'), ready-to-use mermaid and text-diagram templates, concrete file-naming examples ('markdown/20240919_heap-storage.md'), and an explicit 12-section article template. It misses a 5 due to minor gaps: the '所属系列: [数据库筑基课大纲](链接)' placeholder is not a resolvable link, and §九's 'web_fetch' step lacks concrete parameters/handling for failures. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence (读取参考资料 → 提纲 → 逐节撰写 → 自检 → 输出) plus an explicit pre-output validation checklist (§六 '输出前必须核对' with 9 checkbox items) and a closing reminder to re-run the checklist. It falls short of the 5 anchor because there is no explicit error-recovery loop (what to do when a 自检 item fails — fix and re-check — is only implied by '逐项检查'), leaving a minor validation gap at the 4 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a single-file skill with no references/, scripts/, or assets/ bundle at all — everything (a 316-line body, a ~20-line topic catalog table, a ~40-line sample article excerpt, per-category deep-dive guidance) is inlined in SKILL.md. Section headers are clear and navigation is possible, so it is above the 2 anchor, but content that clearly belongs in separate reference files (the 主题速查表 and 示例输出片段, plus per-topic sub-guides) is inlined, matching the anchor-3 pattern of structure present but separable content kept inline. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |