CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

digoal-read-think-writer

以 digoal/德哥 的第一人称口吻重写一篇文章。流程是:先吃透原文(必要时用 mcp__MiniMax__web_search 拓展资料库),再用德哥的语气重新讲一遍,输出 markdown 到当前项目的 `markdown/` 目录(SVG 图存到 `markdown/svg/`,文中以 `![描述](svg/xxx.svg)` 引用)。风格有活人感,不要套用标准写作框架;匹配原文挑文体(随想/知识分享/深度洞察/吃瓜/大事件/吐槽);开头必须有钩子(惊讶/惊喜/反直觉);句子短,一行一句,适合口播;最多 3 段,能 1 段搞定就 1 段。类比时优先用数据库、AI、PG 内核、向量搜索、RAG、PG 运维这些德哥熟悉的领域。适用于:用德哥风格重写一篇公众号文章 / 把一份英文 paper/digest/blog 改写成中文公众号体 / 用德哥第一人称讲一件行业大事 / 让德哥吐槽某个产品或观点。

68

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, actionable writing skill with a clear five-step workflow and a self-check feedback loop, supported by real one-level-deep reference files. Its main weakness is mild verbosity from duplicated trigger sections and some voice detail that could live in the references rather than inline.

Suggestions

Consolidate the 何时触发 (lines 10-19) and 触发词速查 (lines 199-214) sections into one to remove the duplicated trigger lists and tighten conciseness.

Move the hook-candidate list (Step 3.1) and analogy priority list (Step 3.4) into references/digoal-voice.md, keeping only the top-line rule in SKILL.md, so the overview stays lean and progressive disclosure is cleaner.

De-duplicate the hook/套话 rules which currently appear in Step 2, Step 3.1, and the Step 5 self-check — state them once and reference the self-check for enforcement.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The voice rules (hooks, ≤25-char sentences, ≤3 paragraphs, analogy priority) earn their tokens since Claude would not know them otherwise, but the 触发词速查 section duplicates 何时触发 and the hook rules are restated across Step 2, Step 3.1, and the self-check, leaving noticeable redundancy that could be tightened.

3 / 5

Actionability

Guidance is highly concrete — exact paths (markdown/, markdown/svg/), reference syntax, a Mermaid example, the required tool (mcp__MiniMax__web_search), a numbered analogy list, and a self-check checklist — but the style example is explicitly framed as a reference rather than a template, leaving a small gap versus fully copy-paste-ready output.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear Step 0 → Step 5 sequence with an explicit validation checkpoint in Step 5 (自检 checklist with '不通过就改') and a fix-and-recheck feedback loop, matching the anchor for clear sequencing with explicit validation and error-recovery loops.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

SKILL.md is an overview pointing to two clearly-signaled one-level-deep references (digoal-voice.md, style-blueprints.md), both verified to exist, but some voice detail (analogy priority list, hook candidates) is inlined rather than deferred to the references and the trigger sections are duplicated, a minor organization gap.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A highly specific, well-structured description that clearly answers both 'what' and 'when' with a distinctive niche and concrete trigger phrases. The only gap is that a few natural trigger variations (德哥吃瓜/评论/随想) live in the body rather than the description itself.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description lists multiple concrete actions (重写文章, 吃透原文, 用德哥语气重讲, 输出到 markdown/, SVG 存到 markdown/svg/) plus specific style rules and analogy domains, giving comprehensive coverage rather than just a few actions with minor gaps.

5 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers both 'what' (rewrite in digoal's first-person voice, output markdown to markdown/) and 'when' (适用于:with multiple concrete trigger scenarios), matching the anchor for clear and explicit answers to both.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The 适用于 clause provides strong natural trigger phrases (用德哥风格重写公众号文章 / 把 paper 改写成中文公众号体 / 让德哥吐槽产品) with synonyms, but a few common variations (德哥吃瓜/评论/随想) appear only in the body, not the description, so it is not quite comprehensive.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche is highly specific — rewriting articles in digoal/德哥's first-person voice for Chinese 公众号 — with distinctive triggers (德哥口吻, 公众号体, 吐槽产品) and minimal overlap with the separate digoal technical-Q&A skill.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

relative_links

Relative link issues: 2 missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
digoal/blog
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.