CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

finance-explosive-article

Generate stage-3 high-impact publishable markdown articles in 德哥风格 from daily-finance and finance-core-analysis outputs plus current web verification: first-principles mechanisms, counterintuitive '不是A,是B' framing, reusable systemic models, and strict data/logic validation. Use when user wants a 公众号爆款 article, final daily finance article, sharp financial commentary, or first-principles macro/market writing based on upstream markdown documents.

62

Quality

73%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/finance-explosive-article/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A thorough, actionable writing-style skill with a clear pipeline and strong validation discipline, weakened by repetition and a monolithic single-file structure. Splitting reusable material into reference files and de-duplicating constraints would materially improve it.

Suggestions

Consolidate the repeated no-fabrication constraints and merge overlapping 德哥风格 / Non-negotiables sections into one canonical list to reduce repetition (improves conciseness).

Move the article-structure templates, style examples, and source-policy details into files under references/ and link to them from SKILL.md so the body stays a lean overview (improves progressive_disclosure).

Add one fully worked example article (or link to one) so the mandatory structure is demonstrated end-to-end (improves actionability).

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is substantive procedural guidance rather than concept padding, but it is notably repetitive: 'no fabricated data / Never fabricate numbers' appears three times, and the 德哥风格 and Non-negotiables sections restate overlapping constraints, so it could be tightened.

3 / 5

Actionability

Provides a mandatory 9-section article structure with copy-paste-ready model templates ('第一层:触发变量', '第二层:传导机制'...) and concrete title/opening examples; the gap is the absence of a full worked sample article.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear sequenced pipeline (Input → source map → External data step → 德哥风格 → Validation checklist → File output) with an explicit validation checklist and a feedback loop ('weaken the sentence rather than weaken the facts'); the sectioned (non-numbered) presentation leaves minor sequencing gaps.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-sectioned with clear headers, but it is a fully monolithic ~380-line file with no bundle files (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent) and no external references signaled, so content that could be split (style guide, structure templates, examples) is all inline.

3 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that concretely states capabilities and provides an explicit, trigger-rich 'Use when' clause tailored to a Chinese finance-publishing niche. Minor refinements to action phrasing and synonym coverage would push it to the top anchor.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions ('Generate...articles', 'current web verification', 'counterintuitive 不是A,是B framing', 'reusable systemic models', 'strict data/logic validation'); these are partly feature-described rather than pure executable actions, leaving minor gaps versus the comprehensive anchor.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what it does and when to use it, with a concrete 'Use when user wants a 公众号爆款 article, final daily finance article, sharp financial commentary, or first-principles macro/market writing based on upstream markdown documents' clause.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Good natural trigger coverage a finance user would say ('公众号爆款 article', 'final daily finance article', 'sharp financial commentary', 'first-principles macro/market writing'); a few synonyms/variations are missing, falling just short of comprehensive.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche as stage-3 of a named pipeline with distinct output triggers, but minor overlap risk with sibling finance skills (daily-finance, finance-core-analysis) sharing the finance/macroeconomic commentary domain.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
digoal/blog
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.