CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

future-planning-advisor

根据提问者提供的个人背景、资源、困境、目标、行业处境或访谈信息,生成面向未来的中文规划与建议书。Use when the user asks for 个人规划、职业规划、创业规划、人生规划、未来建议书、赛道选择、转型路径、变现方案、产品原型、MVP、团队组建、商业机会分析, and wants a source-backed Markdown report saved under the current project's markdown directory.

68

Quality

82%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, actionable instruction set that appropriately pushes detail into one-level-deep reference files and provides a clear sequenced workflow. The main improvement areas are tightening redundancy between the Workflow and Output Requirements sections and adding explicit per-step validation checkpoints.

Suggestions

Add an explicit validation checkpoint before the save step (e.g., "Verify every market/salary/AI-substitution claim has a linked source and date before saving") to lift workflow clarity toward 5.

De-duplicate the Output Requirements list against the Workflow steps so each deliverable appears once, improving token efficiency.

Include one short worked example inline (e.g., a sample SWOT snippet or one filled 30/90/180-day action block) to make the guidance copy-paste ready.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is efficient and directive without explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the Output Requirements section partially re-lists deliverables already implied by the Workflow steps, a minor redundancy that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Guidance is concrete and executable with specific parameters ("ask up to 5 questions", "2-4 feasible options", "30/90/180-day actions") and a concrete save path, but no worked inline examples of an actual report section or filled template.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear 5-step sequenced workflow with a Quality Bar providing confidence-level marking and viability criteria, but validation is expressed as a quality bar rather than explicit per-step checkpoints with a validate-fix-retry loop.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a well-organized overview that delegates detailed materials to three real, clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference files (profile-framework, report-template, evidence-standards), with no nested references.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it clearly states both what the skill does and when to invoke it, with a comprehensive set of natural Chinese trigger phrases and a distinctive planning-advisor niche. The only soft spot is specificity, since it describes essentially one core action rather than a breadth of concrete capabilities.

Suggestions

Broaden the 'what' clause to list a few more concrete capabilities (e.g., produce SWOT/Odyssey plans, design MVPs and monetization models, generate source-cited market analysis) so specificity matches the strong trigger coverage.

Tighten the output-format phrasing so the distinctive planning niche, rather than 'Markdown report', is the dominant trigger signal and overlap with generic writing skills is minimized.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and one concrete action ("生成面向未来的中文规划与建议书") plus a concrete output artifact (source-backed Markdown saved to a specific directory), but action coverage is narrow rather than comprehensive.

3 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (generate a future-oriented Chinese planning report) and when ("Use when the user asks for..." with concrete trigger phrases), matching the score-5 anchor.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Provides a comprehensive list of natural Chinese trigger phrases users would actually say (个人规划、职业规划、创业规划、赛道选择、变现方案、MVP、团队组建, etc.) with many synonyms and variations.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The trigger set is a clear, narrow strategic-planning niche with distinctive terms (赛道选择、变现方案、MVP), but the generic Markdown-report output framing carries minor overlap risk with general writing skills.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
digoal/blog
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.