Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced workflow with concrete templates and a genuine validation checklist — Claude knows exactly what to do at every step. The main structural weakness is that everything lives in one long SKILL.md with no progressive disclosure into reference files, plus some trimmable boilerplate examples.
Suggestions
Move the Step 4 per-section writing guidance, the Mermaid/ASCII chart samples, and the industry-type emphasis table into one-level-deep reference files (e.g., references/section-guidelines.md, references/chart-templates.md), keeping SKILL.md as a lean overview with clearly signaled links.
Trim the dummy-data Mermaid and ASCII examples to the minimal template form and shorten the Markdown header template, which are longer than needed to convey the required format.
Add an explicit fallback workflow step for when web search returns sparse or conflicting data (beyond the current one-line interval rule), so the validation loop in Step 6 covers data-quality failures too.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Almost every token is non-obvious operational spec (exact search query strings, SVG canvas dimensions and hex colors, section templates, quality checklist) with essentially no re-teaching of known concepts, but full dummy-data Mermaid/ASCII chart samples and the Markdown header template could be trimmed — minor over-explanation consistent with anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance throughout: exact web_search query strings, concrete file paths (markdown/svg/{行业名}-chain.svg), SVG color hex codes and canvas size, Mermaid chart templates, per-enterprise profile templates, TAM/SAM/SOM formulas, and a copy-ready report header — matching the fully-executable anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–6 are clearly sequenced (search → framework → charts → writing → output → validation) with an explicit Step 6 quality self-check checklist and an error-recovery rule for missing data ("若搜不到精确数据，用可信区间表达"), matching the explicit-validation-plus-checklist anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-sectioned but entirely monolithic at ~320 lines with no bundle files: the per-section writing guidance, chart specification examples, and the industry-type emphasis table are inline content that would serve better as one-level-deep reference files, matching the "content that should be separate is inline" anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |